The chosen opposition is the wide-ranging physical familiarity with no familiarity of physical evidences (Nida-Rümelin 1). His first principle disagreement asserts that if Mary has all the physical facts in regard to human shade visualization then she understands the wholesome truth (Nida-Rümelin 1). It can be contended that she however deficiencies satisfactory familiarity in favor of the purposeful realities with respect to individuals sight imaging. This is based on the deficiency of familiarity of details of color variations. Based on hypothetical physicalism, all the bodily possessions can be articulated or advanced in the dialects of bodily familiarity (Nida-Rümelin 1). The dispute should have combine the principle to note that all physical realities can be established casually.