The knowledge argument is intended to establish that conscious experience incorporates non-physical properties

The knowledge argument is intended to establish that conscious experience incorporates non-physical properties (Malatesti 32). It is based on the Qualia premise on the notion that an individual who holds complete physical knowledge in regard to a different conscious being might also be lacking the knowledge of the actual feeling to having the experience of that thing (Malatesti 32). The argument additionally claims that there are truths in regard to consciousness that can never be realized from the wholesome physical truth. For instance when one sees a black car for the first time then later sees a yellow one they are able to learn a different and new truth about the feeling of seeing yellow. Therefore, according to Jackson’s argument different from physicalism, the entire physical truth does not refer to the wholesome truth (Malatesti 32). In that, the acquired physical truth of a black care does not establish or physically communicates the entire truth in regard to the world. Even with the experience of the physical truth of a black vehicle, one is also able to acquire a different truth in regard to a distinct version of a car.