Analyzing ?Death and Justice?

Analyzing ?Death and Justice?

If your own flesh and blood were brutally murdered, would you want the culprit to live the rest of their life in a cell, or be forced to meet the same fate your innocent loved one did This is the question that former New York City mayor, Edward I. Koch, addresses in his 1985 article, ?Death and Justice?, which was printed in The New Republic, a magazine that generally publishes articles dealing with controversial political issues. Koch claims the death penalty is just and defends his statement by using his former public service as ethos, strong language and concrete examples as pathos, and by disproving capital punishment rebuttals as a means of developing logos. Because the readers of this magazine are usually actively involved in political issues, Koch does not have to ?soften up his paper.? He is aiming to prove a point, and the politically sound readers are not going to be scared away by concrete examples and strong language.
Appealing to pathos, this article is very upfront and immediately reveals the authors standing on the matter. In the first paragraph, he gives rather absurd examples of convicted murderers pleading for their lives. Robert Lee Willie (who raped

death, koch, penalty, punishment, capital, justice, being, political, paragraph, issue, barbaric, very, using, saying, reader, pathos, opposition, neighbors, murdered, mayor, examples, claims, worse, strong, states, reasons, readers, question, public, paper, own, opposing, one, new, murderers, logos, lives, life, killing, issues, individual, former, example, ethos, edward, countries, city, been, because, york

Leave a reply

Your email adress will not be published. Required fields are marked*